AN appeal against the refusal of planning permission in Carlisle has been dismissed by the Planning Inspectorate.

The application was for land next to Geltsdale Avenue and Durranhill Road and permission was refused by Carlisle City Council in November 2021.

Ian Murray had applied for planning permission for a detached dwelling and when, it was refused, he appealed against the decision.

In a report by inspector Caroline Mulloy she said one of the main issues was the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with specific reference to trees and whether or not the trees would have an effect on the living conditions of future occupiers.

She the other main issue was the effect of the proposal on the ecology of the area with specific reference to the River Eden Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and biodiversity.

Her report states: "The trees on the site which are covered by TPO comprise a mix of mature Ash, Beech, Elm and Sycamore with a maximum height of around 25m and a spread of around 20m.

"Smaller tree species such as Blackthorn, Cherry, and Elder are also present. The trees can be seen from Alexandra Drive opposite and when travelling in both directions along Durranhill Road. The trees collectively contribute significantly to the verdant character of the area."

According to the report more than 50 per cent of the garden would be overshadowed by trees restricting the enjoyment of the garden by future occupiers.

The report adds: "There would be pressure from future occupiers to prune or remove the trees due to a lack of daylight/sunlight to the rooms and garden and the nuisance of branches and leaves falling on the roof of the dwelling, or on the cars and in the garden.

"Moreover, future occupiers may have perceived concerns over safety, particularly in inclement weather. Whilst I acknowledge that the trees are protected; there would inevitably be pressure to undertake works to the trees or to remove the trees altogether to the detriment of the character and appearance of the area.

"In conclusion, the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area with specific reference to trees. Furthermore, the proposal would have a harmful effect on the living conditions of future occupiers with specific reference to daylight and sunlight."

The report states that pipistrelle and soprano pipistrelle were observed on site but no barn owls were observed.

It adds: "In conclusion, the proposal would have an adverse effect on ecology with specific reference to the SAC and biodiversity in general."

Ms Mulloy said: "For the reasons stated and taking all other considerations into account the appeal should be dismissed."