Tuesday, 09 February 2010

Pity poor Shannon

You tend to wonder how many times in her troubled life kidnapped youngster Shannon Matthews had need to repeat the words she whimpered to policemen coming to her rescue.

karenmatthews
Manipulation: It’s easy to brand Karen Matthews as evil because we can’t face trying to understand how she could do what she did

“Stop it now – you’re frightening me!” she cried, as finally her mother’s plot to exploit the child for a £50,000 windfall was exposed and shattered.

Drugged, deceived, abducted, hidden away as a quick buck opportunity – like a deposit in a short-term, high-interest savings plan – Shannon was coldly used by the one person in the world she should have trusted for unconditional love and absolute protection from harm. The chances of this spectacular experience of fear being the little girl’s first are close to nil.

She was though, lucky in the end. Lucky that police busted the calculated scam; lucky that having done so, the law was able to remove her from the poisonous presence of her mother; lucky that now she will be able to look forward to a life of stability and care in a new family.

Other children like Shannon will not be so fortunate. Other children on Dewsbury’s Moorside Estate, where Shannon and her mother Karen had lived, won’t know how to hope for such luck. Their lives will trundle on in the same old routine of neglect and a fear so commonplace they grow not to notice it.

They will continue that way because that’s how life is prescribed – quite deliberately – for the Shannons of this world.

No matter how indignantly outraged local and national politicians sound in their feigned shock at the depth of deprivation suffered by Shannon Matthews and her ilk, what hurts them most is the rising to the surface of secret sins they would prefer to ignore. And they feel a lot safer if we can ignore them too.

When Moorside Estate and so many sink estates like it were created they were populated by design with families no one really knew what to do with. Ghettos were designated for an underclass, the dysfunctional, uneducated and hopeless. Drink, drugs, loan-sharking, child-porn downloading, neglect and abuse, they were left to do what they do – however distasteful or dangerous – at a safe and forgettable distance from the middle classes who would swoon in horror should they ever turn up as neighbours.

These ghettos were and are called communities – as though that forgives everything. Moorside was and is a community. But it is one without diversity. A common thread of nothingness binds neighbours together.

There are no excuses for Karen Matthews. There can be no sympathy for a woman who sees children as meal tickets to benefits at best, a commodity to be held to ransom at worst.

But none of us should run away with the idea that this no-mark, criminally selfish mother is uniquely evil. To do so would be to hide from the truth that dysfunctional, uneducated, hopeless families exist in their thousands on every sink estate ghetto in the country; that children like Shannon, Baby P, Victoria Climbie and so many more remain at risk in sad approximations of homes... and still we’d like to pretend they have nothing to do with us.

Evil is an overused word meaning nothing much at all outside of a child’s Sunday School prayer. Karen Matthews is branded as evil because we can’t face trying to understand the reality of a parent having felt so little about her children for so long – and with nobody challenging her about it – that she will do absolutely anything she thinks she may have a chance of getting away with. She wanted money more than her daughter’s health, happiness and wellbeing.

Would she have used it for chance of escape to a better life for her family? Unlikely. Karen Matthews could have blown £50,000 in the local Asda’s wines and spirits department without pausing to draw breath.

Was she even thinking of how her share of a £50,000 media reward for the discovery of her daughter would have enhanced or improved her life? Also unlikely. This isn’t a woman who thinks through a plan to its ultimate conclusion, with added element of risk assessment for safety – she’s never had to do that. When she needs a few quid extra, she finds a new bloke and gets pregnant again.

She is a woman refusing to take any responsibility for anything – but then why would she when, barring kidnap, nobody who isn’t dysfunctional, uneducated and hopeless gives a fig about how her behaviour affects her children or how the behaviour of others on her estate affects their children?

There are no excuses for Karen Matthews. She deserves not to be pitied but to be judged and vilified. But so, I believe, do the cloud cuckoo-land social planners who reckoned that by lumping together all their problem people on one grotty estate they could kill two birds with one stone. Little bird: looking good for providing social housing. Big bird: keeping problem people out of sight and out of mind.

As the economy sinks daily into deeper crisis, calls for more social and council housing grow louder and more urgent.

Please God, before more knee-jerk government responses repeat the failed social experiments that created Moorside, let’s think anew about that big bird before hurling the stone. Out of sight and mind will invariably lead to out of control and off the radar of social services rescue.

Abandoned people will always behave the way they would be expected to behave. When hope isn’t on their menu, there’s absolutely nothing to lose – apart perhaps from a daughter... and there are plenty more where she came from.

Yes, Shannon Matthews was lucky – luckier than her friends who keep their own secrets within the walls of their approximations of home. But as her name is added to a shameful list of children at appalling risk from parents an inadequate social system has failed to identify as dangerous, we who look in only momentarily on chaotic lives too frequently ignored, can only echo the words of a little girl, crying in the dark.

“Stop it now – you’re frightening me!”

 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Have your say

One of the points made again and again (and repeated this lunchtime on Radio 4's Media Show, is that the estate where Shannon lived should NOT be condemned wholesale because of the actions of one hopelessly inadequate family. Throughout the whole sorry affair the community showed love and concern and were duped. Today we heard that in fact most of the families were in working households, and the spokesperson for the tenants' association spoke with pride about her friends and neighbours. How easy it is to condemn an estate 100 miles away with no fear of redress. If you can't be rude about local estates then don't dismiss a whole community out of hand with such ease. Let us learn from what has happened and pray that the person who matters most in this whole sorry affair (Shannon) recovers and is now being lovingly cared for in an experienced foster family.

Posted by Janet Mansfield on 10 December 2008 at 17:58

Bitter words but we all have choices and we all share part of the blame. There have always been those with more and those with less in society, neither are exempt from inequity or criminal behaviour.

There is no quick or easy way out, there never has been and the author gives us few clues as to where we go from here to raise standards. She is right though, few of us choose to live next door to people like Karen Matthews because we choose to work for our living and take pride in a different set of morals. We join our predecessors in trying to find a solution to an age old problem.

Posted by Jules on 9 December 2008 at 16:36

View all comments on this article

Make your comment

Your name

Your Email

Your Town/City

Your comment


Vote

More than two-thirds of children aged 5-7 use the internet at home. Is this a good idea?

Yes, if they are supervised and made aware of the dangers

No, it's much too young and they should be playing with other kids

Show Result