X

Cookies

Continue We want you to get the most out of using this website, which is why we and our partners use cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to receive these cookies. You can find out more about how we use cookies here.

Friday, 01 August 2014

Subscriptions  |  evouchers  |  Jobs  |  Property  |  Motors  |  Travel  |  Dating  |  Family Notices

Ministers lied to in West Coast Mainline contract fiasco - report

The transport department has been slammed for its “irresponsibility” in the collapse of the £5 billion West Coast Mainline rail contract.

A committee of MPs said the department had embarked on an “ambitious, perhaps unachievable” reform in haste, and claimed that ministers and senior officials were lied to.

FirstGroup was told it had won its bid to take over the franchise from Virgin Trains, but the decision was scrapped after the discovery of “significant technical flaws” in the way the procurement was conducted.

Virgin has now been told it can run the Carlisle to London service until November 2014, with the fiasco costing taxpayers over £40 million.

The mistakes came to light after bidder Virgin Trains, which had run the West Coast Mainline since 1997, launched a legal challenge against the decision.

A Government-commissioned report led by businessman Sam Laidlaw last month gave a damning indictment of how the competition was handled.

Three members of staff at the DfT were suspended over the episode.

The Transport Committee said in its report yesterday that embarking on the reform of franchising on the UK’s most complex piece of railway was “irresponsible” and needed greater senior executive involvement and more technical expertise.

“A more direct description of what happened is that ministers and senior officials were lied to about how the outcome of the franchise competition had been reached.” said the MPs’ report.

“We cannot categorically rule out the possibility that officials manipulated the outcome of the competition not only to keep First Group in the running for as long as possible, as Mr Laidlaw suggested, but to ensure that First got the contract.

“We recommend that the DfT find a way of undertaking a full email capture, reporting to someone suitably independent, to help get to the bottom of why DfT staff discriminated against Virgin and in favour of First Group during the franchise competition.”

The committee said that money which could have been spent on transport projects had instead gone to consultants, lawyers and review teams, on work which achieved nothing, and compensated train operators for the DfT’s “incompetence.”

Louise Ellman, chair of the committee said: “This episode revealed substantial problems of governance, assurance, policy and resources inside the Department for Transport.

“Embarking on an ambitious, perhaps unachievable, reform of franchising, in haste, on the UK’s most complex piece of railway was an irresponsible decision for which ministers were ultimately responsible. This was compounded by major failures by civil servants, some of whom misled ministers.”

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

News & Star What's On search





Vote

Should uninsured drivers' cars be seized?

Yes

No

Show Result

Hot jobs
Scan for our iPhone and Android apps
Search for:
NEWS & STAR ON: