The Government will begin the process of removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords on Thursday, as it introduces legislation to reform the upper chamber.
Abolishing the 92 seats reserved for hereditary peers was one of Labour’s manifesto commitments, and is expected to be followed by the imposition of a retirement age of 80 on members of the Lords.
Officials have previously described the continued presence of hereditary peers in the Lords as “outdated and indefensible”, with reform “long overdue and essential”.
Cumbrians Lord Inglewood and Lord Henley both sit in the House of Lords due to their birth right but under Labour’s plans for the modernisation of parliament, both Cumbrian peers would be forced to give up their seat in the Lords.
The House of Lords has more than 800 members with almost 100 of them sitting as hereditary peers.
Tony Blair cut the number of hereditary peers when he first came into office in 1997, and Sir Keir Starmer will attempt to cut them out altogether.
READ NEXT: Carlisle MP leads calls to 'press ahead' with Border Rail study
All members of the House of Lords are unelected, and some are nominated by different political parties to scrutinise legislation passed by the House of Commons whilst.
Critics of the system say that the Lords is ‘undemocratic’ and ‘unaccountable’ whilst others argue that unelected politicians are able to effectively scrutinise legislation without having to answer to the electorate.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel