Bradford is home to some lovely properties- and some of them are more expensive than you might think.
Using data from the property experts, Zoopla, we can reveal the most expensive streets in Bradford to buy a house on.
Currently, the average value for a detached three bedroom property in Bradford is £234,588- but some properties on the more expensive streets could fetch over £1 million.
Here are the most expensive streets in Bradford, according to data and ‘Zed Index’ (avergage property price) estimates from Zoopla.
5 expensive streets in Bradford
(Google Map images are just for area guidance)
Acacia Park Drive
According to Zoopla, this is the most expensive street in Bradford. The average property value on the street is £702,441.
The most expensive property on the street is a detached house with an estimated value of £969k-£1.19m. It was last sold in 2004 for 801,500.
Woodlands Drive, Apperley Bridge
The average property value on Woodlands Drive is £602,325.
One six bed property on the street has an estimated value of £959k-£106m.
High Meadows, Wilsden
Zoopla estimates that the average property value on High Meadows in £519,823.
One property sold for just £215,000 in 1999- but now it has an estimated value of £584k-£714k.
Bents Lane, Wilsden
The average property on Bents Lane has an estimated value of £513,461.
One of the higher-end propertiest has an estimated value of £638k-£957k.
Apperley Lane, Apperley Bridge
Apperley Lane properties have an average value of £461,836.
One of the most expensive properties is a semi-detached house, with an estimated value of £674k-745k.
This property was last sold in 2018 for £650,000.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article