Continue We want you to get the most out of using this website, which is why we and our partners use cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to receive these cookies. You can find out more about how we use cookies here.

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

Subscriptions  |  evouchers  |  Jobs  |  Property  |  Motors  |  Travel  |  Dating  |  Family Notices

MPs will find a way (out)

The latest money-saving scheme to be floated by the Government involves cutting the pay of civil servants who work in the regions.

Chancellor George Osborne says wages for public workers should reflect the pay of those employed by private companies.

So government and council staff should be paid different rates depending on whether they work in the expensive south or the cheaper, more value-for-money north.

I can see the reasoning behind this and I can see the argument against it – that by doing this, vital spending money will be removed from depressed and struggling local economies and will strengthen the divide between the rich south and poorer north.

But there is another point to be made on this issue.

If this regional pay structure does go ahead, will it mean that those well-paid, highly-pensioned all expenses-paid civil servants that are better known as MPs will all be paid different rates depending on where their constituencies are?

Surely the arguments used for public sector workers apply the same? If not, why not?

We’re all in this together aren’t we? I suppose our MPs will argue they are ‘special cases’.


News & Star What's On search


Will the Union Cairn make a difference to the 'No' vote campaign?

Yes, it's an effective way of getting across the fact Scotland and England should stay united

No, people have already made their mind up which way they are going to vote

No. It may backfire because some Scots will say it is the English interfering in their referendum

Show Result

Hot jobs
Scan for our iPhone and Android apps
Search for: