In the fast and frenetic world in which we live, we now expect instant responses to any new developments.
This is a direct consequence of the way we now communicate; through computers, iphones, 24-hour news channels, and iPads – all of which create the expectation of immediate answers and responses to the issues before us. This means that the opportunity for reflection or consideration is greatly diminished, and I often wonder if this is a good thing for society.
Last month there were two significant political events. Matters of importance and national significance that could have long term consequences for our country.
First we had the Autumn Statement, which set out the Government’s plans in terms of expenditure and taxation over the short and medium term. There was, as always, a media frenzy with analysis over what the Government intended to do and how their policies would actually impact upon us. The simple reality is, however, that nothing immediately changed. It is now quite apparent that the state of the economy will take many years to fully repair given the major damage that was sustained during the crash of 2008. Short term solutions can not be the answer.
The second major development was the report by Lord Leveson on the media. Again, as the report came out there was an immediate call by many people for immediate government action. What was really required was a sober reflection on the contents of Levesson’s report and his suggestions for improving our media.
The Autumn Statement is part of the annual ritual of British politics and will have some impact on our economy over the long term. The strength and success of our economy is vital to our individual prosperity and, to a certain extent, the cohesion of our society.
As for the Leveson report into media regulation; it is an extremely serious issue that could have major long term consequences for our democracy.
There was some appalling behaviour by a number of journalists and media outlets. It is entirely understandable that people would want to see a very strict regime put in place and the unacceptable media activities curtailed.
But I believe there is a great danger of over-reacting. The overwhelming majority of those working in the media, such as our local newspaper and radio stations, have acted properly and as good journalists should.
Yes, there will always be a danger that some members of the media overstep the mark, and when they do they should be held to account. But our democracy is dependent and indeed strengthened by a free, strong and investigative media. That is why it is so important that we have a period of reflection to decide what is in the best interests of our democracy not just for the next few years, but for the very long term.
I am firmly of the view that a legislative approach has inherent dangers. Once statute is brought in to regulate the press, in whatever form, it is open to amendment and expansion. At some point in the future a less benign and democratic government could try to nibble away at the freedom of the press which could have huge long term consequences.
It is therefore vital that a new and effective solution is found to oversee the press and ensure that the opportunity for inappropriate behaviour is greatly reduced, whilst at the same time maintaining the democratic benefits of a strong and powerful media.
These were two specific events from December, but one of the major highlights of 2012 was the Olympic Games. All the things that made the Games so special did not happen overnight. The building of the stadium and facilities, the organisation and timings of events, the opening and closing ceremonies – these all took years of planning from the moment we were awarded the Games. And the athletes, who were the stars of the event, will have been preparing for even longer.
So, in a 24-hour world which demands instant gratification, I believe the highlight of the year was an event which took slow and careful organisation and preparation. Perhaps this is something we politicians should take note of.
Published: January 7, 2013
Have your say
Be the first to comment on this article!
Make your comment
- It’s all gone south for us northerners (19 comments)
- Represent us on parking charges (3 comments)
- Take a bite out of me, me, me (4 comments)
- Cumbria: outdoors theme park or sprawling retirement village (3 comments)
- More Mark Green
Have your say
- 'We're hidden in full view because we look like the guy next door'
- Solfest music festival gets 2015 date
- Copeland council backs Civic Hall and new public loos plans (7 comments)
- I won't quit vows Cumbria council leader after parking charges climbdown (23 comments)
- Carlisle man can recall days of the week back to 1801 (2 comments)
- Man who scrapped Cumbrian on-street parking charges to quit (15 comments)
- £2m Carlisle football complex given the go-ahead (22 comments)
- Carlisle woman voted third most influential black person (9 comments)
- Cumbrian couple charged £100 for bad TripAdvisor review (40 comments)
- On-street parking charges for Cumbria scrapped (88 comments)
|NEWS & STAR ON:|
- Year of success for Cumbria university's business interaction centre
- Gold medal for Brampton apprentice at national auto competition
- New hotel team is ready to push the business forward
- Scotland move for motorway services empire
- What is a grant of probate?
- Look ahead
- Herd instinct grips crowded ringside
- Andrew brings his skills and flair to the table
- Foreign growth secret to playground firm’s success
- Orders on tap for brewer’s customers
- Planning go-ahead for Cumbria council's new £10m HQ
- Police traffic warning ahead of Ulverston Dickensian Festival
- Carlisle builder accused of breaching restraining order
- Salon robber jailed for more than seven years by Carlisle court
- Pub chain’s dream of 52-bed Barrow hotel unveiled
- Ofsted raps Barrow academy chiefs over fall in standards
- Supermarket beggar jailed
- Sounding a little tinny!
- 130 guns and ammunition handed to Cumbria Police
- Cumbria's Black Friday retailers revealed