Continue We want you to get the most out of using this website, which is why we and our partners use cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to receive these cookies. You can find out more about how we use cookies here.

Wednesday, 03 June 2015

Subscriptions  |  evouchers  |  Jobs  |  Property  |  Motors  |  Travel  |  Dating  |  Family Notices

Council confirms plan to demolish Whitehaven town centre loos

Controversial plans to demolish Whitehaven’s only toilet block have been approved by Copeland councillors.

Whitehaven toilet block photo
The loos

It was a split decision by members of a planning meeting as five voted for the demolition and five voted against.

The casting vote was made by the chair of the planning panel Councillor Geoff Blackwell, who agreed with the recommendation to demolish the toilet block on James Street.

Following the decision, Mr Blackwell said: “We all have strong feelings but we are here as a planning committee. Unfortunately that is all we are allowed to look at in terms of legislation and law, that’s difficult at times- very difficult.”

Councillors who voted against the demolition harboured hopes that the toilet block on James Street could have reopened in the future.

John Jackson said the community was “gutted” when the public toilets closed.

He said: “If it had not shut then it [the planning permission for its demolition] wouldn’t be before this panel now.”

Councillors were told that they must only deal with planning issues and that permission is required for the site as it falls within a conservation area. Two letters of objection were also received by the council. Councillors were told that there is no chance that the building will be reopened and the closed building is still costing the council money in maintenance and rates.

Its removal will open up views and enhance the area, councillors were also told.

Copeland council has already closed the facility, amid public outcry, as part of a raft of budget cuts.

A 2,000-signature petition submitted to Copeland failed to overturn the decision.

It is proposed that the land be restored to a hard surface to match the surrounding paving, and will not form part of a highways improvement scheme.


News & Star What's On search


Which would you rather pay - £1m to replace a burst pipe or the unspecified cost of wasted water?

False economy by United Utilities to allow leaks from old pipes to continue

The customer suffers AND pays the bills - always the same

Patience. There's not always the money to react immediately

Show Result

Hot jobs
Scan for our iPhone and Android apps
Search for: