Tuesday, 09 February 2010

Call for rethink on pool planned for Carlisle's Sands Centre

A new swimming pool planned for the Sands Centre in Carlisle will be too small, says the city’s amateur swimming club.

Sands centre graphic 5
How the Sands Centre could look

Carlisle City Council has announced a £14m revamp of the Sands in partnership with the University of Cumbria.

The scheme includes a 25m eight-lane pool to replace that at The Pools in James Street, as well as a small learner pool.

Now the City of Carlisle Amateur Swimming Club has written to mayor Bill Graham asking for a rethink.

The letter, from committee member Douglas Mullins, says: “This design will give no flexibility in use. A much better solution would be to build a 50m competitive pool with a moveable boom.”

This would allow public swimming in one half of the pool while club training took place in the other half.

His letter adds: “Clubs would pay for their swimmers to train in a first-class pool. This could include national and area squads.”

The main pool in James Street is 33m long. The nearest 50m pools are 100 miles away in Glasgow and Edinburgh.

But the club’s call for a 50m pool at the Sands is unlikely to get a sympathetic response from the city council. Council leader Mike Mitchelson told an executive meeting last month that it would be too expensive.

He said: “It would have cost an extra £16m and an extra £500,000 in subsidy.

“Even the Sports Council predicts that it would take a population of one million to support an Olympic-size pool.”

Mr Mullins’ letter complains that the club and other swimming groups were not invited to or even told about that meeting.

The swimming club is also concerned that the new pool will have only 150 seats for spectators. It argues that at least 250 are needed. And it says there must be enough pool-side space for competitive events.

The letter concludes: “This has the potential to be a first-class asset to the university, Carlisle, Cumbria and the surrounding area. Please let’s get it right.”

Speaking today, Mr Mitchelson said he welcomed the views of pool users. He added: “The plans fit in with the Amateur Swimming Association’s regional strategy but are still at very early stages of design.

“Carlisle Leisure [which operates the Sands] will be discussing the detail design of the proposals with the pools’ users and representative groups.

“However, we have to be realistic. A 50m pool will not form part of the overall scheme. There are logistical and financial constraints which cannot be overcome.”

The council agreed last week to release £150,000 to take forward the Sands scheme. It will also bring a bigger gym, a ‘school of sport’ for the university and a new sports hall freeing up the existing hall for shows and conferences.

The scheme is due for completion by autumn 2012.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Have your say

John - Is the Sands not central for Carlisle? North would be up in Kingstown would it not?

Could there not be some sort of partnership with the Richard Rose Academies? I heard they were hoping for a pool at Morton and they have more than enough space (plus replace the existing old pool there).

Communities need not be effected either. The closing of James Street would not be the end of the world for leisure swimmers. Pools still exist at Trinity, Morton and St Aidans under carlisle leisure. If competitive swimmers are given a pool which they should recieve (50m) then all of these pools will be avaiable full time for the community without clubs booking the whole pool out at certain times.

Posted by JJ on 30 November 2009 at 00:01

Yet more facilities being moved to the north of Carlisle. It is time the council came up with ideas for the south side of the city. The council is leaving the areas to the south of the city centre to rot. They should be ashamed. instead of building Supermarkets on the fields on the edge of carlisle they should concentrate on the grossly neglected areas to the south of the city centre.

Posted by JOHN on 21 November 2009 at 19:09

View all comments on this article

Make your comment

Your name

Your Email

Your Town/City

Your comment


Vote

More than two-thirds of children aged 5-7 use the internet at home. Is this a good idea?

Yes, if they are supervised and made aware of the dangers

No, it's much too young and they should be playing with other kids

Show Result