I’m not losing my religion
Last updated 11:53, Wednesday, 07 May 2008
A Rastafarian student has been banned from Carlisle clubs and bars because she wears a hat as part of her religion.
Aisha Brown, 20, is turned away from Carlisle night spots every week because of a strict clubland dresscode forbidding headgear which could help disguise the identity of the wearer.
Rasta women – known as Queens – are expected to keep their head covered in public at all times. They are not allowed to cut their hair, wear make-up, dress in revealing clothes or eat on Fridays.
Aisha, who was brought up as a Rastafarian by her parents Elaine and Levi, came to Carlisle from Coventry last September to study Dance and Musical Theatre at the University of Cumbria. She now lives in the halls of residence on Brampton Road.
Two Botchergate bars – Terminal One and Walkabout – have now relaxed the ban on her hat, but Lloyds No1 Bar, also on Botchergate, has insisted she will not be allowed in wearing it.
Aisha said: “I love to go out on the town but I get refused entry to places on Botchergate all the time, like every week. I don’t think a Muslim wanting to go into a pub or club would face the same situation.
“Some of the door staff are nice and let me in, but others just refuse. I try to explain but they just say things like ‘I don’t care. You're not coming in’.
“It’s ten years behind everywhere else in the country – it’s mad.
“I've even had door staff say stuff like ‘let me touch your hat or you're not coming in’. It’s embarrassing.
“I never had this problem in Coventry because it’s a much more multi-cultural place."
Lloyds No1 Bar manager Stuart Hill said: “We have a no hats, caps or beanies allowed rule due to the cameras not being able to identify the faces of the customers when wearing them. In my experience things like age and ethnicity don’t matter as it’s strict company policy.”
Terminal One said it changed it’s policy on headgear three weeks ago, while a Walkabout spokesman said that although the bar does have a no headgear policy, it is willing to make an exception for Aisha.
Terminal One general manager James Mackie said: “I actually changed the ruling when I took over three weeks ago. Before that hats weren’t allowed because of issues with CCTV but that has now changed.
“I feel we have adequate CCTV from enough angles to always identify faces.
“I’ve also changed the ruling because they’re a fashion accessory. We wouldn’t knock David Beckham back if he came in with a cap on so I don’t think we should stop anyone else.”
Walkabout spokesman Matt de Leon said: “Although we do operate a ‘no head gear’ policy at all of our bars, there are some situations where this policy is relaxed, and this is one such situation. We are more than happy for Aisha to visit the bar while having her head covered, and our door staff are aware of this.”
Good gracious me!tut,tut, what a lot of hot air about nothing.In this society we all have to live to a certain set of rules and standards.That applies whether we live North or South,East or West.
When you work on any building site you wear a hard hat,reason,health and safety.When you work in a bakery or food preperation you wear a hair net,reason,food hygiene. When you drive an HGV or car, you wear a belt,reason,compulsory.That is how it works, if our doormen says no,that is how it works. Up here in Cumbria,some of us refuse to be shackled to the robotic PC brigade.A lot of posts in the news and star claim that we are now multicultural,mabye so but look where it has got us, freedom of speech is all but gone.
View all comments on this article
Have your say
Aisha is a great gal, religion is religion, some things may be outrageous, but to wear a hat to cover hair is not unreasonable, besides, its not like Aisha's hat covers her face at all, which is the issue for clubs with the use of their security cameras.
Posted by LC on 12 May 2008 kl. 21:21